Well guys, I know I haven't posted here in a few weeks but I am back with another filter experiment and this one is hot. This week we are comparing the Toyota filter to the all famous K&N filter. Hope you enjoy
`````````````````````````````````````````````
K&N VS TOYOTA Denso (Oil Filters)
PRICE: (excluding tax)
K&N:
$9.98 + .50 cent echo fee (Mopac)
Toyota OEM filter:
$6.99 echo fee included (From any Toyota dealership)
Exterior: (before cutting)
Dimensions:
Width is the same. Toyota filter is 1/2 of an inch taller, sitting at 3.5 inches tall. K&N is only 3 inches tall.
Pre-Lubed seal:
K&N:
NO
Toyota:
Yes
Sealed bottom:
K&N:
NO
Toyota:
Yes
Interior: (after cutting)
Anti Drain back Valve:
K&N :
Yes
Toyota:
Yes
Filter material: (It is only visual, I am not a filter expert)
K&N: To my shock K&N filter element has the same paper feel to it, like the other cheap looking brands. Metal plates are glued to the filter element at each end. As you can see in the picture the filter is not glued together properly. Anti drain back valve is at the top of the filter and is the same design, if not the exact one, as the FRAM filter!!!!!! Who make K&N filters again?
Toyota: Again Feels like Fabric rather than paper. Toyota filter is held together by clear plastic pieces that are pressed into the filter base at each end. Anti drain back valve is also at the top of the filter.
Filter Height:
K&N: 2.0 inches or 5.3cm
Toyota: 3.0 inches or 7.5 cm
Number of folds of the filter element:
K&N:
39 folds (Lowest number and the same as FRAM filter…)
Toyota:
44 folds
Valve structure:
K&N: Metal and plastic
Toyota: Metal and plastic
I would have to say that the K&N filter is not impressing at all. I thought that it would be another great filter like the Purolator PureONE, but it is far from it. The way it’s put together is so cheap. If I were to grade it, I would put it at the bottom after the Fram filter. Don’t waste your money on this filter. I would buy a Toyota filter anyday…..
Pictures: